Pay To Stay” Prison Program A Miserable Failure
In the counties of Butler and Hamilton, Ohio, the sheriff’s departments attempted to collect money from inmates to pay for the cost of their stay at jail. A miserable failure, the program was halted a few weeks ago after it cost taxpayers $69,000 to settle a federal lawsuit. The state auditor put an end to the program because it wasn’t generating any revenue.
Despite this fact, these counties are discussing reviving the program through collecting booking fees. Financial analysts remain dubious. Even in the best case scenarios, the policy may not be lucrative at all; most prisoners that end up in jail have no money.
Lawsuits were the issue that stopped the program in the first place. An Ohio prison nearby originally began charging booking fees at a hundred dollars and an additional $67.77 daily charge for every day held. But federal lawsuits against Hamilton and Butler counties started the end to “pay to stay” programs. The major issue at hand was determining who had to pay the fee.
Ohio law allows a county to charge inmates for room and board, medical and dental treatment, property damage and a onetime booking fee. Prisoners must be billed at the end of their stay, but the key provision of the law is that convicted inmates only could be charged. The District Judge said that it was unconstitutional to take these fines from inmates who were not yet convicted.
Hamilton County was taken to court in 2000 and was ordered to return around one million dollars in prison fees and to pay $150,000 for an educational program for inmates. In 2001, Butler County was also sued. By 2003, the grand total of money that was returned to settle litigation was $63,846 to 2,431 prisoners. Additionally, the county was ordered to pay a $5,000 donation to the Legal aid Society after officials did not add the agreed upon ten percent interest on refund checks.
Although the plan to charge pay to stay fees to prisoners has failed, and has cost taxpayers more money than the program is worth, the Sheriff’s department still looks to extract more money from the jail. Charging booking fees, and taking in out of state prisoners are current considerations.
Mallory Megan works for Rapid Recovery Solution, a medical debt collection agency. Having trouble collecting money from small claims? collection agencies can help.
How Will A Collection Agency Try To Collect My Debt?
Collection agencies primarily use letters and phone calls to achieve collection. Collection letters are typically computer generated, and differ in severity. The first letter usually starts with a simple “reminder” tone and as the letters progress they may build up to a final demand.
The first demand letter legally must inform the debtor that they have the capability of disputing the validity of the debt, or if they choose to, request written verification of the debt. If they would like to receive written verification, the agency by law must send some sort of confirmation after verifying it with the original creditor. Demand letters will also confirm that they come from a debt collector, and that any information obtained will be utilized in the attempt to collect debt.
The envelopes of collection correspondence cannot reveal anything that might suggest that it is a collections letter. Therefore, any type of mail that might be embarrassing or public, such as a post card, would be strictly prohibited. The return address should also be discrete; as a result many collection companies will just use their company’s initials, or some other type of vague name.
The nature of the additional notices will depend on the debtor’s reaction. If a debtor agrees to pay off the debt this will most likely result in letters written with a gentler tone. Belligerent reactions, or even a lack of reaction from the debtor might result in a more threatening tone to the letter.
The idea of debt collection is to try to achieve a sense of urgency. Most debt collectors are aware that many debtors owe many types of debt and seek to instigate the debtor to prioritize their particular account. Deadlines may be set, with vague threatening tones, but failure to respond usually results in only more correspondence. Collection letters will always try to convince the debtor to call the collection agency on the telephone directly. If the debtor does not within thirty days, then the collector will often initiate phone calls.
Mallory Megan works for Rapid Recovery Solution and writes articles on commercial collection agencies Check here for free reprint licence: How Will A Collection Agency Try To Collect My Debt?.
Wyoming City Is Attempting To Collect
In the city of Cody, Wyoming, 219 utility accounts were sent for collection. Only four of the bills belonged to property owners. Some are suggesting that the city council consider holding property owners responsible for utility costs that their renters left unpaid. A policy like that could have added $180,000 to the city budget during the past five years, and furthermore, other utility users are subsidizing those that don’t pay their bills.
Landlords are offering fast and obvious objection, asking the city council why it should be their responsibility to pay for a bill that someone else racked up. Another plan has been proposed though, one that would require a deposit from every person opening up a utility account.
This change in policy would involve a number of modifications like a requirement that a property owner co-sign for a renter’s account. Tenants would be billed under their own account but have an open landlord account for each property. Unpaid bills would be transferred to the landlord’s account if the tenant doesn’t pay.
Deposit requirements would go from $150 to $200, and would be required for all accounts, regardless of their credit history in the past. Property owners would be notified of late payments, and they would be encouraged to contact the city to see if the bill got paid before returning rental deposits. All property owners would have to keep utilities in their names.
Supporters of the plan allege that it is not out of line with what other cities are doing, and it is a simpler and the most cost efficient way to collect debts. Collection agencies get about one third of what they collect in the city, and 60 percent of bills that go to collection remain unpaid.
No matter what decision they arrive to, it should be quick: city officials are noting a trend towards fewer people making deposits and more accounts being sent out for collection.
Mallory Megan works for a debt collection company. She also composes articles on business, finance, consumer spending and collection agencies. You are welcome to reprint this article – but get your own unique content version here.
Collection Agency Tries A Different Approach In Poor Economy
The bill collections industry’s tactics may be taking a turn for the….better? Keeping in mind the amount of recent lawsuits against debt collection agencies, ACA International, the biggest trade group of professional creditors and collectors, says more and more collection agencies are working towards training collectors to take a more of an empathetic position.
Empathy may just be the plan of action that can turn the industry around. A large number of people who owe money are being called by various collections agencies, and if they do obtain money, they are not going to want to give it to the aggressive threatening collector, they will give it to the person they can work with.
As agencies are perfecting training courses to include advice on how to be gentler with consumers, there will be a change of focus that includes being put on coaching, mentoring and counseling debtors, rather than aggressively threatening them. Trainees are urged to reflect on their personal experiences with collectors or someone that they know has dealt with them.
One recent trend has been to suggest that debtors speak with their parents or grandparents about taking out a loan against their life insurance policies or reverse mortgage against their house. The collectors who practice this technique claim that our grandparents remember the Great Depression. They may not want this generation to feel that kind of pain and may be more apt to take a loan against the life retirement account or the life insurance policy.
Collectors who practice this philosophy think that it is in actuality a positive thing. They think that it doesn’t hurt anyone. If a person borrows against life insurance it may be preferable to borrowing against a 401(k) or a retirement plan. This is because the person will be counting on that money to survive.
Wrong or right, it would do the collections industry some good to evaluate its situation, and look for new innovative ways to collect in a suffering economy.
Mallory Megan works for a debt collection agency. She also composes articles on business and finance, consumer spending and collection agencies. Don’t reprint this exact article. Instead, reprint a free unique content version of this same article.